Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1952 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 143 vs 133 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €201.0 vs €379.64
- Up to 51% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €1.41 vs €2.85 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
143
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€201
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €201 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
133
93%
Value, €/FPS
€2.85/FPS
49%
Price, €
€379.64
52%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |