Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 286 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - €211.0 vs €806.48
- Up to 72% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-14700K - €1.16 vs €4.16 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 7% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-13400F - 194 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 28 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
182
93%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€211
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €211 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.16/FPS
27%
Price, €
€806.48
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €806.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i7-14700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 20 |
16 | Threads | 28 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |