Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 576 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 208 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 48 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€255.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €255.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53660 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1235
76.61290322580645%
Multi-Core
7407
100%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 48 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |