Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1955 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-4130T - 413 vs 391 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - €30.28 vs €158.88
- Up to 79% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-9400F - €0.08 vs €0.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6037 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
391
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6037 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |