Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - €30.28 vs €118.03
- Up to 71% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-10600KF - €0.25 vs €0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4130T - 136 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
122
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
28%
Price, €
€118.03
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €118.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130T | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |