Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 3412 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - €30.28 vs €109.75
- Up to 68% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-13100F - €0.24 vs €0.75 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 18% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-4130T - 146 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 8 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
124
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
32%
Price, €
€109.75
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €109.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130T | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |