Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 6 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 3100 - 112 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - €89.94 vs €118.03
- Up to 21% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-10600KF - €0.83 vs €1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
79%
Price, €
€118.03
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for €118.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
108
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |