Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i5-4690S - 154 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690S
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - €70.78 vs €136.32
- Up to 46% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-10600KF - €0.48 vs €0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
53%
Price, €
€136.32
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for €136.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16430 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
149
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €70.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16429 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-4690S |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |