Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-4690S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2511 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-4690S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690S
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-4690S - 132 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i5-4690S - €69.02 vs €70.78
- Up to 7% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-4690S - €0.52 vs €0.56 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690S - 8 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €70.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14451 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14451 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690S | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |