Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 614 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G6900 - 216 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - €78.8 vs €136.32
- Up to 41% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i5-10600KF - €0.37 vs €0.63 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
58%
Price, €
€136.32
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for €136.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15651 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
212
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €78.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15650 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |