Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - €30.28 vs €209.77
- Up to 85% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-10600K - €0.14 vs €0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-4130T - 219 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 12 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
213
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.96/FPS
14%
Price, €
€209.77
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €209.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130T | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |