Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €30.28 vs €208.88
- Up to 81% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i5-11600K - €0.23 vs €1.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 35% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i3-4130T - 174 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 12 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
129
74%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17588 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
174
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.2/FPS
19%
Price, €
€208.88
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17588 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |