Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €30.28 vs €288.88
- Up to 87% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-10900F - €0.05 vs €0.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Minecraft than Core i3-4130T - 736 vs 651 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 20 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
651
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
736
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
12%
Price, €
€288.88
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |