Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-3770K - 360 vs 326 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €203.76 vs €272.66
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €272.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74059 minutes ago
Buy for €203.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74058 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
707
42.18377088305489%
Multi-Core
2469
29.302159981011155%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |