Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €30.28 vs €349.57
- Up to 91% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-10900KF - €0.18 vs €1.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-4130T - 181 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 20 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
170
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13255 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.93/FPS
9%
Price, €
€349.57
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for €349.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13254 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |