Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1691 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - €30.28 vs €260.91
- Up to 88% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen 5 2600X - €0.12 vs €1.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 4% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-4130T - 261 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 12 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
251
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Buy for €260.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |