Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700 is 1220 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - €30.28 vs €228.88
- Up to 86% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-7700 - €0.25 vs €1.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4130T - 131 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
122
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Buy for €228.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130T | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |