Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Core i5-4670T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2524 days newer than Core i5-4670T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than Core i5-4670T - 180 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670T - 8 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670T | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |