Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3570K is 218 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570K
- Performs up to 0% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G1610 - 212 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-3570K - €88.88 vs €188.88
- Up to 53% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-3570K - €0.42 vs €0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570K - 55 vs 77 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
47%
Price, €
€188.88
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 336 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
211
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 336 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |