Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Core i5-2467M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2043 days newer than Core i5-2467M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2467M
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 17 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 70% better in League of Legends than Core i5-2467M - 68 vs 40 FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
68
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2467M | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |