Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2400 is 1208 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1840 - 321 vs 319 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i5-2400 - €19.0 vs €406.63
- Up to 95% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-2400 - €0.06 vs €1.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 53 vs 95 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €406.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13930 minutes ago
Buy for €19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13929 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |