Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1218 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €9.9 vs €379.64
- Up to 95% better value when playing Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.23 vs €4.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 109% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Celeron G1840 - 90 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €9.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
90
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.22/FPS
5%
Price, €
€379.64
2%
FPS Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |