Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700 is 2826 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i7-12700 - €9.9 vs €302.0
- Up to 96% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-12700 - €0.09 vs €2.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700
- Performs up to 28% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1840 - 148 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €9.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 367 minutes ago
Buy for €302 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |