Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 4279 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-2400 - 262 vs 230 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i5-2400 - €386.01 vs €406.63
- Up to 17% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-2400 - €1.47 vs €1.77 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €406.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13426 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
262
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€386.01
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €386.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13426 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |