Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3399 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 131% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-2400 - 60 vs 26 FPS
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-2400 - €246.59 vs €406.63
- Up to 74% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-2400 - €4.11 vs €15.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 20 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €406.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14082 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
60
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€246.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €246.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14082 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |