Buy on Amazon
€20
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2400 is 694 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1610 - 321 vs 317 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - €20.0 vs €72.66
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 55 vs 95 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel CORE I5-2400 3.10GHZ SKT1155 6MB CACHE BOXED, BX80623I52400 (SKT1155 6MB CACHE BOXED)
Buy for €20 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74323 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74323 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
76.89530685920577%
Multi-Core
739
45.986309894212816%
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
