Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G1610 vs FX-4300

Celeron G1610 vs FX-4300: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

AMD FX-4300

3.8 GHz | 4-core

AMD FX-4300 Logo
Hegem AMD FX-Series FX-4300 FX 4300 Processore CPU Quad-Core da 3,8 GHz FD4300WMW4MHK Presa AM3+ Senza Ventola

Buy for 24.38 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 74702 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

AMD FX-4300

3.8 GHz | 4-core

AMD FX-4300 Logo
Hegem AMD FX-Series FX-4300 FX 4300 Processore CPU Quad-Core da 3,8 GHz FD4300WMW4MHK Presa AM3+ Senza Ventola

Buy for 24.38 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 74702 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — FX-4300 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4300 is 41 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1610.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610

  • Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 55 vs 95 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of AMD FX-4300

  • Performs up to 0% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1610 - 318 vs 317 FPS
  • Up to 66% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - €24.38 vs €72.66
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of Overwatch 2.
Overwatch 2

Overwatch 2

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Epic

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


FPS

317

99.68553459119497%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

€72.66

33%

AMD FX-4300 Logo
FX-4300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


FPS

318

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

€24.38

100%

FPS Winner

Hegem AMD FX-Series FX-4300 FX 4300 Processore CPU Quad-Core da 3,8 GHz FD4300WMW4MHK Presa AM3+ Senza Ventola

Buy for 24.38 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 74702 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Epic

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012

AMD FX-4300 Logo
FX-4300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


Single-Core

426

95.08928571428571%

Multi-Core

739

67.79816513761467%

AMD FX-4300 Logo
FX-4300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


Single-Core

448

100%

Multi-Core

1090

100%

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo

Intel Celeron G1610

vs
AMD FX-4300 Logo

AMD FX-4300

Dec 3rd, 2012
Release DateOct 23rd, 2012
CeleronCollectionFX
Ivy BridgeCodenameVishera
Intel Socket 1155SocketAMD Socket AM3+
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
4
2Threads
4
2.6 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.8 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed4.0 GHz
55 W
TDP95 W
22 nm
Process Size32 nm
26.0x
Multiplier19.0x
Intel HD
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockable
Yes

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.