Buy on Amazon
€88.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3220 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3220 is 91 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 11% better in Diablo IV than Celeron G1610 - 101 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - €18.29 vs €88.88
- Up to 82% better value when playing Diablo IV than Celeron G1610 - €0.18 vs €0.98 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
101
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.29
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3220 3.30 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 3 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processore LGA 1155
Buy for €18.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
