Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3220 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3220 is 778 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than Core i5-760 - 157 vs 154 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-760 - €18.15 vs €19.99
- Up to 8% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-760 - €0.12 vs €0.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
157
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €18.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Buy for €19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |