Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240 is 91 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 2% better in Minecraft than Celeron G1610 - 612 vs 598 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
598
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18546 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |