Buy on Amazon
€88.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2400 is 694 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-2400 - €88.88 vs €406.63
- Up to 78% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-2400 - €0.58 vs €2.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G1610 - 155 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
154
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15833 minutes ago
Intel CORE I5-2400 3.10GHZ SKT1155 6MB CACHE BOXED, BX80623I52400 (SKT1155 6MB CACHE BOXED)
Buy for €406.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15834 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
