Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2947 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 29% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8320E - 152 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
152
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€297.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €297.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 366 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | AMD FX-8320E |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |