Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3046 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 86% better in Dirt 5 than FX-8320E - 259 vs 139 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
259
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€690
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €690 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | AMD FX-8320E |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Raphael | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 95 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |