Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2256 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 5500% better in Cities: Skylines II than FX-8320E - 56 vs 1 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
56
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€243
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €243 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | AMD FX-8320E |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |