Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Dead Space than Celeron G3930 - 160 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - €63.66 vs €171.79
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €171.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Buy for €63.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
26.55021834061135%
Multi-Core
1043
9.706840390879478%
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |