Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1987 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 59% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 3 1200 - 488 vs 306 FPS
- Up to 18% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 3 1200 - €0.36 vs €0.44 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - €134.26 vs €174.0
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
488
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€174
77%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €174 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50727 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
306
62.704918032786885%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
81.81818181818181%
Price, €
€134.26
100%
Buy for €134.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50728 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Single-Core
984
42.96943231441048%
Multi-Core
2834
26.37505816658911%
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |