Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 365 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-12100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Starfield than Core i3-12100 - 73 vs 70 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - €112.67 vs €174.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-13400F - €1.61 vs €2.38 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
73
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.38/FPS
67.64705882352942%
Price, €
€174
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for €174 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50720 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
70
95.8904109589041%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€112.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €112.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50721 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
2149
93.84279475982534%
Multi-Core
6877
64.00186133085157%
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i3-12100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 60 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |