Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2409 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-6900K - 165 vs 157 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - €188.88 vs €201.5
- Up to 2% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-13400F - €1.2 vs €1.22 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €201.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
157
95%
Value, €/FPS
€1.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |