Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3902 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 21% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-3770K - 195 vs 161 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - €200.99 vs €261.4
- Up to 36% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-3770K - €1.03 vs €1.62 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€200.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €200.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Buy for €261.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 77 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |