Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 2986 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 19% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4130T - 210 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - €30.28 vs €219.64
- Up to 84% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-12600K - €0.17 vs €1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
210
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
16%
Price, €
€219.64
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €219.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
177
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600K | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |