Buy on Amazon
€285.82
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $233
Availability
MSRP in USD: $233
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600 is 315 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Performs up to 11% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-10105F - 147 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-12600 - €76.36 vs €285.82
- Up to 70% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-12600 - €0.58 vs €1.94 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-12600
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.94/FPS
29%
Price, €
€285.82
26%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-12600, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop cache 18M, fino a 4,80 GHz
Buy for €285.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€76.36
100%
Value Winner
Intel, processore desktop Core i3-10105F 10, di 10ᵃ generazione (frequenza di base: 3,7 GHz, turbo boost: 4,4 GHz, 4 core, LGA1200) BX8070110105
Buy for €76.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-12600
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
