Buy on Amazon
€204.79
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $212
Availability
MSRP in USD: $212
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 3319 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 14% better in Deathloop than Celeron G1610 - 191 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-12500 - €72.66 vs €204.79
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-12500 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Core™ i5-12500, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop cache 18M, fino a 4,60 GHz
Buy for €204.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 641 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-12500
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
18.433578537429685%
Multi-Core
739
8.139662958475604%
Intel Core i5-12500 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
