Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3123 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-4130 - 253 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
253
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€179.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €179.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |