Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3417 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than FX-4130 - 205 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €141.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74779 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |