Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 973 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 179 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 64% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €136.32 vs €379.64
- Up to 64% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.76 vs €2.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 16 vs 12 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€136.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €136.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16468 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
178
99%
Value, €/FPS
€2.13/FPS
35%
Price, €
€379.64
35%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16469 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |