Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F and the cheaper Core i5-10400F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €141.58 vs €278.88
- Up to 48% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-10700F - €0.25 vs €0.48 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-10400F - 584 vs 562 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
562
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€141.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €141.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8319 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
584
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
52%
Price, €
€278.88
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €278.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8319 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |