Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 759 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €167.42 vs €255.66
- Up to 32% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-10700F - €0.85 vs €1.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Core i3-8100T - 204 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 16 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
196
96.07843137254902%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€167.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €167.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58177 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.25/FPS
68%
Price, €
€255.66
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for €255.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1073
66.56327543424318%
Multi-Core
3027
41.86142995436316%
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |