Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 944 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G3900 - 120 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - €60.9 vs €322.64
- Up to 81% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-8100T - €0.52 vs €2.69 per FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €322.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
117
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |