Buy on Amazon
€122.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1492 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 13% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G1610 - 138 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 51 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - €72.66 vs €122.66
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i3-7100 3.9GHz 3MB Cache intelligente Scatola
Buy for €122.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74469 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74468 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-7100
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
34.161988773055334%
Multi-Core
739
30.28688524590164%
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
