Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €35.36 vs €271.25
- Up to 86% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-10700F - €0.26 vs €1.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-6100 - 146 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
137
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.86/FPS
13%
Price, €
€271.25
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €271.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |